FRS 102 vs FRS 105; is 105 holding you back?

UK companies must meet specific financial reporting standards when preparing and filing their statutory accounts.

If your company is a small business or micro entity, you don’t have to file your full accounts with Companies House.

Instead, you can file a shortened or abridged version.

There are two financial reporting standards for doing this; FRS 102 and FRS 105.

How should you decide which of these to use?

 

What is FRS 102?

 

FRS 102 represents simplified financial reporting for SMEs. This general-purpose standard includes some disclosure exemptions. This means there are only certain pieces of information you need to include in your statutory accounts.

These include:

  • Balance sheet
  • Profit and loss account
  • Notes about the accounts
  • Director’s report
  • Name and signature of the company director

Essentially, FRS 102 is a single reporting standard that applies to a broad range of businesses that qualify as small companies.

To qualify as a small company, you must meet two out of these three criteria:

  • Annual turnover of £10.2 million or less
  • Balance sheet total of £5.1 million or less
  • Fewer than 50 employees on average in the previous financial year

Small companies can benefit from following the FRS 102 financial reporting standard because it reduces the amount of information they must prepare and file for their statutory accounts. At the same time, it is still a recognised financial accounting standard.

 

What is FRS 105?

 

FRS 105 is the financial reporting standard for companies classed as micro-entities.

It’s based on FRS 102 but is simplified further. Under the FRS 105 financial reporting standard, your statutory accounts must include:

  • Balance sheet
  • Profit and loss account

This simplified format reflects the size and nature of the micro-entities that can use it for their annual accounts.

For your business to qualify as a micro-entity, it must meet two of the following conditions:

  • Annual turnover not more than £632,000
  • Balance sheet total not more than £316,000
  • Fewer than 10 employees on average in the previous financial year

 

FRS 105 vs FRS 102

 

The choice between FRS 102 vs FRS 105 for your UK business depends primarily on the size and complexity of your business. FRS 102 is designed for medium-sized and large entities, providing a comprehensive framework suitable for businesses with more complex financial transactions and reporting needs. On the other hand, FRS 105 is tailored for micro-entities, offering a simplified accounting standard that reduces the burden of detailed disclosures and accounting treatments.

Reporting under FRS 105 comes with several drawbacks however, such as limited ability to revalue assets, restricted accounting options (e.g., for financial instruments and deferred tax), and minimal disclosures, which can potentially impact transparency and make it harder to obtain financing or attract investors. Additionally, the simplicity of FRS 105 may pose challenges for credit rating agencies to assess your business thoroughly, potentially leading to less favourable credit ratings.

If your business qualifies as a micro-entity under the Companies Act 2006, with turnover, balance sheet total, and employee numbers below specific thresholds, FRS 105 may be appropriate due to its simplicity and reduced administrative load. However, if your business is larger, has more complex financial reporting requirements, or seeks greater transparency and flexibility, FRS 102 would be the suitable choice.

For advice on which accounting standard is more suitable for your business, please get in touch.

Newsletter

Subscription